Skip to main content

Re-imagining Public Health: Towards a One Health Approach

Some might wish to forget the year 2020 as soon as possible. However, if there is one thing we can learn from it, I believe it is that we, as a species, are fragile, and that our health and well-being are closely intertwined with the health and well-being of our living environment.

One health: the health of all living beings
on this planet is connected
Of course, this has been made clear by the pandemic that — at the time of writing — has taken over 1.8 million human lives. COVID-19 is a zoonotic disease, an infectious disease that spreads from animals to humans. Six out of ten known infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin [1] and of all emerging diseases even three out of four.[2] Major risk factors for emerging zoonoses are our destruction of the natural environment, which brings us into closer contact with animals with whom we have had little prior contact. And, our livestock industry, which raises billions of animals in often poor sanitary, unhealthy and tightly packed conditions. Our animal farms are breeding grounds for new diseases and scientists fear a new strain of avian flu might develop that has the potential to be many times more deadly than COVID-19.[3] The current pandemic has hardly come as a surprise to insiders.[4]

But it is not only pandemics that highlight the intimate connection between our own health, and the health of the animals we rear and our environment. Climate change is considered by medical scientists to be one of the biggest threats to our public health, as it will lead to more extreme weather, heat waves, drought, spread of infectious disease and food insecurity. Pollution already is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, killing on estimate over 9 million people yearly. Moreover, eating animal products is also directly detrimental to our health, the billions of animals we kill every year, lead to over 10 million human casualties every year as well.

Industrial animal farming is a biological time bomb
The next pandemic is already in the making

Let there be no misunderstanding: we cannot be healthy on a sick planet, surrounded by sick animals. We can hide behind masks and quarantine all we want, we should let go of the illusion that we are or can separate ourselves from our natural environment. We can simply not continue to destroy the life on our planet and somehow expect that our lives will not be affected by it or that technology will save us. If you needed another argument, this is now equally evident from a medical perspective. That is why here, now, is a call from the medical profession to adopt a One Health approach: recognizing that the health of humans cannot be seen in isolation from the health of animals and ecosystems. Science is affirming what spiritual traditions of old have always known: we are all connected, if we destroy life on our Mother Earth, we destroy ourselves.

Originally posted as a collaborative blog post on Re-Imagining our Future 

1

[1] Common diseases like the flu, measles, the mumps and the cold all come from animals.1

[2] The list is long: Swine flu, AIDS, SARS, MERS, ebola...

[3] Another danger is antibiotic resistance, as many farm animals are routinely fed antibiotics.

[4] In fact, here’s an article from Septembere 2019 warning for a coronavirus zoonosis in China.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's the matter with foreign aid? (3) Towards collaborative aid

In the first part of the essay, we sketched the economical and political historic background of the current aid system. In the second part, we looked at things in the current NGO-based aid system that are not quite optimal. In the final part, I will start addressing solutions, based on my own experience. What does impactful, effective NGO work look like? We should focus on a paradigm of collaborative, community-based aid, rather than aid delivery. How to create good conditions for people? An impactful paradigm is grassroots and not top-down. Local people should be co-creators, who, with the support of aid agencies, move towards becoming more independent and self-sustaining. Aid oughtn't be ‘pushed’ on local people. The Listening Project talks about a ‘collaborative aid system’.(1) You could also call it a community-based approach, where you strengthen local communities by building strong ties with them and giving them the support that really need. You achieve this by taking your ...

AI: Slimme Technologie die ons dom zal maken?

  Zal Artificiële Intelligentie ons afnemen wat ons menselijk maakt? Moet er nog zand zijn? Artificiële intelligentie overheerst het publieke debat. De wildste speculaties doen de rond over de toekomstige rol ervan in onze samenleving. Ik zou graag stilstaan bij de diepere impact van AI op onze menselijke psyche. Welke gevolgen kan AI voor ons hebben als mens, als sociaal en cultureel wezen? AI wordt ons verkocht als het technische wondermiddel dat alles sneller en efficiënter zal maken. Dat kan goed zijn, maar de vraag is: tegen welke prijs? Op het eerste zicht helpen de grote taalmodellen ons zeker om sneller teksten te schrijven, filmpjes te maken en antwoorden te vinden op onze vragen. Op termijn zullen we dus minder zelf schrijven, en ook minder zelf denken. Dit houdt een risico in. Elke menselijke vaardigheid vraagt oefening om te ontwikkelen en te onderhouden, zo niet gaat ze verloren. Na de industriële revolutie verdwenen vele ambachten, aangezien ze overg...

What's the matter with foreign aid? (1) Development as colonialism

This is the first part of a three part critique of our aid and development model. This first part of this essay is a brief look into the historical context of our current development paradigm. (1) I grew up believing that something changed after WWII, there had been a global awakening, and the start of a period marked by international collaboration and respect for human rights, advanced by such historic achievements as the founding of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the independence of former colonies. Based on these new foundations, there would be a steady progress towards, peace, freedom and equality, thanks to a process called 'development'. I am a bit older now, and have worked for nearly 7 years in this field of development. My optimism has faded, and I am starting to fear it may have been a naive childhood illusion. Has anything really fundamentally changed? Development as we know it today started after the second World War. At the end of...