Skip to main content

Lord of Chaos

I have written quite a few pieces about him already, but hopefully this will be my last. Donald Trump keeps intriguing. His rise to power surprised many, as does the continuing support of his base throughout his presidency, despite breaking every political rule in the book. It seems hard at times to make sense out of his often inconsistent, contradictory and chaotic behavior. However, I do not think he acts randomly or incoherently. There is one thread that weaves through much of his leadership – one that is so unpleasant we might not want to see it. It is no coincidence Trump enjoys the company of autocrats such as Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-Un. One of the main things that characterizes Donald J. Trump as a leader is, I believe, authoritarianism.

Trump seems to have a knack for riling up people

You may call him a bad leader, there is one thing Donald Trump is a master in: creating discord. After Barack Obama’s time in office, many on the left might have been lulled into thinking of the United States as a united nation. However, divisions along race, class and party lines run deep through American history and society, and eight years in office can never be enough to mend them. Trump brought them all back to the centre, more central than they had been in a long time.

You may think he did so out of incompetence, racism or plain old meanness, yet sowing discord is an essential characteristic of authoritarian leaders. Autocrats capitalize on people’s fear and anger. They create a sense of confusion, instability and turmoil, and then present themselves as the strongmen who will protect their people from the dangerous forces that are assailing them. So while they pose as those that will reinforce ‘law and order’, they are actually doing the exact opposite. Law and order is just a proverbial carrot they are holding out to people, the chaos they cause being the stick.

Authoritarian leaders know how to bring out the worst in people. They incite fear and rage – as Trump routinely does at his rallies. They will make people so afraid they will go to any length to ensure their safety. They know how to exploit the cracks in the system, and elicit people’s suppressed rage. To win his election for instance, he managed to tap into the despair of many working class people who felt left behind after Obama’s promises had failed to work out for them, and who saw no chance for a better future for themselves amidst continuing immigration and financial crises.

Autocrats survive on an ‘us vs. them’ mentality. They live in a very black and white world. There is no gray, no room for nuance. You are either with them or against them, as Trump has repeatedly shown in his contempt for the ‘fake news’. Autocrats do not want critical thinking, they want you to have blind faith in them, and accept whatever reality they hold out for you, however inconsistent or contradictory it might be. They are always in the right. Their self-aggrandizement amounts to narcissism, something I have discussed in my previous post. Some even call them malignant narcissists, combining narcissism with aggression, antisocial behavior and sadism. 

Donald Trump seems to get along well with leaders like Putin.
This is no coincidence.

In order to create this dichotomous mentality, autocrats play the nationalist card. They appeal to people’s identification with their country, which happens to be quite strong in the US. Authoritarians do not appear in a vaccuum, but emphasize (an extreme version of) certain national values, which they hold up as the only ‘real’ version. Trump will make America ‘great again’, promising to restore it to its original glory. He emphasizes typical American themes such as American exceptionalism, individualism and personal liberty (when it comes to carrying guns and ignoring lockdowns for instance).

All of this sounds quite gloomy, is there anything we can do about it? There is, in fact, but it has to be different from what media, politicians or angry protesters have done so far. Repeated attacks on Trump have not led to any change. They might well have had the opposite effect. As Martin Luther King once said: ‘Hatred cannot drive out hatred, only love can.’ As long as we continue to have heated debates, we reinforce the climate of rudeness and divisiveness Trump creates. We need to tell a different story, one of togetherness and connection. We need to reach out across party, class and racial lines, from an honest belief that we ‘are not as divided as our politics suggest,’ to quote Barack Obama. The good news is, we can all be part of this: we can embody this togetherness in our lives and find way to come together in peace, brotherhood and sisterhood, and overcome the divide. That will dramatically diminish his chances in the election, but even if he loses, the work will be far from over.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Humanity 2.0 - 10 Principles for a Compassionate Society

Great news! I co-authored a book, and it finally got published! It is called Humanity 2.0 - 10 Principles for a Compassionate Society . I wrote it together with Aviram, the founder of Sadhana Forest , the community in India where i lived for 7 years. In a nutshell, it is a book about the vision and values behind Sadhana Forest. It offers an in-depth discussion of the ideals of Aviram and his family, on which he built Sadhana Forest and which he has been putting into practice for over 20 years. So it is not a book about Sadhana Forest as such, but about how to create an inclusive and compassionate life and community, in terms of parenting, education, health, economics, community etc. Quite broad and ambitious! The book is based on Aviram's experience, combined with a lot of research.  What was my role in the birthing of this book? When i came to Sadhana Forest, i always felt so inspired to hear Aviram talk, and i wanted everyone to be able to receive his wisdom. I approached Av...

What's the matter with foreign aid? (3) Towards collaborative aid

In the first part of the essay, we sketched the economical and political historic background of the current aid system. In the second part, we looked at things in the current NGO-based aid system that are not quite optimal. In the final part, I will start addressing solutions, based on my own experience. What does impactful, effective NGO work look like? We should focus on a paradigm of collaborative, community-based aid, rather than aid delivery. How to create good conditions for people? An impactful paradigm is grassroots and not top-down. Local people should be co-creators, who, with the support of aid agencies, move towards becoming more independent and self-sustaining. Aid oughtn't be ‘pushed’ on local people. The Listening Project talks about a ‘collaborative aid system’.(1) You could also call it a community-based approach, where you strengthen local communities by building strong ties with them and giving them the support that really need. You achieve this by taking your ...

What's the matter with foreign aid? (1) Development as colonialism

This is the first part of a three part critique of our aid and development model. This first part of this essay is a brief look into the historical context of our current development paradigm. (1) I grew up believing that something changed after WWII, there had been a global awakening, and the start of a period marked by international collaboration and respect for human rights, advanced by such historic achievements as the founding of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the independence of former colonies. Based on these new foundations, there would be a steady progress towards, peace, freedom and equality, thanks to a process called 'development'. I am a bit older now, and have worked for nearly 7 years in this field of development. My optimism has faded, and I am starting to fear it may have been a naive childhood illusion. Has anything really fundamentally changed? Development as we know it today started after the second World War. At the end of...